From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Yugo Nagata' <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: libpq debug log |
Date: | 2018-09-07 13:28:10 |
Message-ID: | 4bc9abbd-44a0-1787-b410-4e68b5ab3228@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/09/2018 02:29, Iwata, Aya wrote:
> Since I'd like to monitor the information the server and the client exchange,
> I think monitoring protocol messages is good.
>
> When a slow query is occurs, we check this client side trace log.
> The purpose of this log acquisition I thought is to identify where is the problem:
> server side, application side or traffic.
> And if the problem is in application side, checking the trace log to identify what is the problem.
Between perf/systemtap/dtrace and wireshark, you can already do pretty
much all of that. Have you looked at those and found anything missing?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-09-07 13:45:10 | Re: libpq stricter integer parsing |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-09-07 13:17:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module |