|To:||Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>|
|Cc:||Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: New default role- 'pg_read_all_data'|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, November 23, 2020 11:31 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> - Anastasia Lubennikova (a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru) wrote:
> > On 29.10.2020 17:19, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > - Georgios Kokolatos (gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > >
> > > > this patch is in "Ready for committer" state and the Cfbot is happy.
> > > > Glad that's still the case. :)
> > >
> > > > Is there any committer that is available for taking a look at it?
> > > > If there aren't any objections or further comments, I'll take another
> > > > look through it and will commit it during the upcoming CF.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Stephen
> > CFM reminder. Just in case you forgot about this thread)
> > The commitfest is heading to the end. And there was a plenty of time for
> > anyone to object.
> Thanks, I've not forgotten, but it's a bit complicated given that I've
> another patch in progress to rename default roles to be predefined
> roles which conflicts with this one. Hopefully we'll have a few
> comments on that and I can get it committed and this one updated with
> the new naming. I'd rather not commit this one and then immediately
> commit changes over top of it.
May I enquire about the status of the current?
> Thanks again!
|Next Message||Peter Eisentraut||2021-03-04 14:56:07||Re: Feedback on table expansion hook (including patch)|
|Previous Message||John Naylor||2021-03-04 14:37:50||Re: Force lookahead in COPY FROM parsing|