Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date: 2012-06-29 18:31:59
Message-ID: 4FEDF49F.5080404@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> My idea of "not dedicated" is "I can launch a dozen postmasters on this
> machine, and other services too, and it'll be okay as long as they're
> not doing too much".

Oh, 128MB then?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-06-29 19:07:41 Re: new --maintenance-db options
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-06-29 18:30:28 Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework