Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Date: 2012-05-16 18:04:15
Message-ID: 4FB3EC1F.1070004@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/16/12 10:53 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Joshua Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Before restarting it, you need to do pg_basebackup and make a base
>>> backup
>>> onto the standby again. Since you started the standby without
>>> recovery.conf,
>>> a series of WAL in the standby has gotten inconsistent with that in
>>> the master.
>>> So you need a fresh backup to restart the standby.
>>
>> You're not understanding the bug. The problem is that the standby came up and reported that it was replicating OK, when clearly it wasn't.
>
>> 8. Got this fatal error on the standby server:
>>
>> LOG: record with incorrect prev-link 0/70000B8 at 0/70000E0
>> LOG: record with incorrect prev-link 0/70000B8 at 0/70000E0
>>
>> ... this error message repeated every 5s.
>
> According to your first report, ISTM you got error messages.

Only *after* it was correctly setup.

Josh's point is that if you flub the configuration, you should get an error, which is not what's happening now. Right now it just comes up and acts as if nothing's wrong.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2012-05-16 18:05:15 Re: Pre-alloc ListCell's optimization
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2012-05-16 18:02:28 Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication