Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Date: 2012-05-16 18:02:28
Message-ID: 4FB3EBB4.3090603@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Well, that is a form of testing. :)

My point was that we need some kind of regression tests around all the new replication stuff, and if you had some scripts that would be a useful starting point. But it sounds like you haven't gotten that far with it, so...

On 5/15/12 10:12 AM, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I didn't get as far as running any tests, actually. All I did was try to set up 3 servers in cascading replication. Then I tried shutting down master-master and promoting master-replica. That's it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On May 13, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> More issues: promoting intermediate standby breaks replication.
>>>
>>> To be a bit blunt here, has anyone tested cascading replication *at
>>> all*
>>> before this?
>>
>> Josh, do you have scripts that you're using to do this testing? If so
>> can you post them somewhere?
>>
>> AFAIK we don't have any regression tests for all this replication
>> stuff, but ISTM that we need some...
>> --
>> Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
>> 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
>>
>>
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2012-05-16 18:04:15 Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2012-05-16 17:07:05 Re: [BUG] Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments