Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application
Date: 2012-04-11 06:21:07
Message-ID: 4F8522D3.9060806@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 04/10/12 11:09 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>> why not just implement it as....
>> >
>> >user application -> SQL -> PLjava FDW functions -> pljava code -> JDBC
>> >-> foreign database
>> >
>> >(and of course, back to return the data from said foreign database)
>> >
> Hi John,
>
> Hmm.That sounds good,but where does the FDW come in?Will the user
> application interact with the FDW,and FDW handle the SQL calls and
> everything else from there i.e. FDW wraps the entire process,right?

see dblink ofr an example API
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/dblink.html

the 'pljava fdw functions' are the publicly visible pljava functions
implementing your api... while my 'pljava code' are additional
functions/methods you use internally that aren't visible externally

--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2012-04-11 06:22:35 Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application
Previous Message Hitoshi Harada 2012-04-11 06:18:44 Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2012-04-11 06:22:35 Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application
Previous Message Hitoshi Harada 2012-04-11 06:18:44 Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application