Re: PostGIS in a commercial project

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostGIS in a commercial project
Date: 2011-10-27 23:54:07
Message-ID: 4EA9EF1F.40900@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 10/27/2011 04:24 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
> <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> I note in the OPs case they are relying on the customer to install
>> PostGIS. The GPL only applies to *redistribution* not usage. So if
>> you're not supplying your customers with PostGIS then the fact that
>> it's GPL seems completely irrelevent.
>>
> Also as a note here, if linking implied derivation, then all software
> that ran on Windows would be illegal to distribute without Microsoft's
> permission...... Yet at least here in the US, jailbreaking an iPhone
> is legal in the opinion of the Copyright Office because it allows fair
> use of the device, namely installing apps that Apple hasn't otherwise
> authorized. So I'd generally agree with the assessment above.

Not to be a killjoy but unless any of us is an attorney, I suggest we
defer to a person with a law degree. This seems more like a question for
the SFLC than for the general community.

JD

>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Denne 2011-10-28 01:37:18 Server move using rsync
Previous Message Chris Travers 2011-10-27 23:24:55 Re: PostGIS in a commercial project