RE: Size and size_t in dsa API

From: "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Size and size_t in dsa API
Date: 2018-09-20 10:13:31
Message-ID: 4E72940DA2BF16479384A86D54D0988A6F19AD70@G01JPEXMBKW04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> As a non-expert developer's opinion, I think mixing of Size and size_t makes difficult
>to understand source code.
>
>Agreed. Let's change them all to size_t and back-patch that to keep future
>back-patching easy. Patch attached.

Thank you for the quick action. I'm happy now.
I confirmed English word Size in comment is kept as it is.

====================
Takeshi Ideriha
Fujitsu Limited

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2018-09-20 11:23:42 Re: doc - add missing documentation for "acldefault"
Previous Message Marco Slot 2018-09-20 10:00:18 Segfault when creating partition with a primary key and sql_drop trigger exists