| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Adding callback support for custom statistics kinds |
| Date: | 2025-12-09 23:05:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4E61FDC4-CFBB-4116-980F-75ADD245A1F6@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Dec 10, 2025, at 05:54, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> IIUC, if *any* error occurs outside of a deserialize callback, first the "error"
> code will be called, followed by "done" which will then trigger the
> end_extra_stats
> callback that will perform the cleanup.
That is true. But problem is, without an error indication, end_extra_stats(STATS_READ) can only blindly perform cleanup works. As you are providing general purposed callbacks, who knows what scenarios extensions would do, so it’s better to provide more information to callbacks. IMO, letting end_extra_stats() know current situation (normal or failure, even error code) is very meaningful. For example, my extension may want to log “I am forced to quite due to outside error” or “I am done successfully” in end_extra_stats(). Anyway, that’s my own opinion. If you and Michael still consider that’s not a problem, I won’t argue more.
Best reagards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-12-09 23:07:01 | Re: Fix a minor typo in the comment of read_stream_start_pending |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2025-12-09 23:02:21 | Re: Fix incorrect comments in tuplesort.c |