Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message:
>
>> I think that Peter's real concern is whether these are worth
>> translating, and I share that doubt. Perhaps we should invent an
>> errdetail_internal, parallel to errmsg_internal, that works like
>> errdetail but doesn't treat the message as a candidate for
>> translation?
>
> Yeah. The other point is that translated versions of those
> phrases are likely to introduce randomly diverging terms, which is
> not going to help with debugging. As long as the technology is
> new enough that a user is going to need help from -hackers (or at
> least someone who read and grokked README.SSI) to debug a problem,
> there's no benefit to translating those errdetails.
OK, since that seems to be the consensus, I put a patch together.
Testing it now. Will post once I've confirmed it doesn't break
anything.
-Kevin