Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory
Date: 2011-06-01 22:23:09
Message-ID: 4DE6BBCD.50301@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> No, it isn't. You're making way too many assumptions about where things
> really were and what arguments were given to pg_ctl start. We went
> around on this before, which is why it's not "fixed" already.

What should I search on? I can't find the relevant discussion.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-01 22:25:43 Re: pgpool versus sequences
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-01 22:22:56 Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory