Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-04 23:18:55
Message-ID: 4DC1DEDF.2050602@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On 5/4/2011 1:26 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
> out there with "lightening tables". Built for speed but not
> persistence.
>
> Hey, nobody liked evanescent, so I'm trying a different route...

ACID Free.

>
> -Kevin
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2011-05-04 23:23:05 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous Message David Fetter 2011-05-04 23:14:49 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson 2011-05-04 23:22:25 Re: DLL export with mingw-w64: currently a no-op
Previous Message David Fetter 2011-05-04 23:14:49 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory