| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-04 23:23:05 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinTjxP5hBe0DsywFEoFLsxO5rcWwA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On 5 May 2011 00:18, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/4/2011 1:26 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>
>> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
>> out there with "lightening tables". Built for speed but not
>> persistence.
>>
>> Hey, nobody liked evanescent, so I'm trying a different route...
>
> ACID Free.
Low Fat Tables?
The problem with a nice marketable name is the potential to mislead.
Fast Tables is the simplest so far, but it kinda suggests it's a
special new type of table only distinguished by the fact that it's
faster.
Thom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-05-04 23:45:43 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-05-04 23:18:55 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-05-04 23:23:31 | Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype |
| Previous Message | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson | 2011-05-04 23:22:25 | Re: DLL export with mingw-w64: currently a no-op |