Re: Named restore points

Em 08-02-2011 11:05, Simon Riggs escreveu:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:15 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> + else if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_NAME)
>>> + snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
>>> + "%s%u\t%s\t%s named restore point %
>> s\n",
>>> + (srcfd< 0) ? "" : "\n",
>>> + parentTLI,
>>> + xlogfname,
>>> + recoveryStopAfter ? "after" :
>> "before",
>>> + recoveryStopNamedRestorePoint);
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter if it is after or before the restore point.
>> After/Before
>>> only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time.
>> Removed.
>>>
>>
>> you're right
>
> Not sure I understand the comment "only make sense when we're dealing
> with transaction or time." Why?
>
Because named restore point is a noop xlog record; besides, transaction and
time involves xlog records that contain data.

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/