| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Named restore points |
| Date: | 2011-02-08 17:14:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1297185263.1770.8372.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:07 -0300, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> > Not sure I understand the comment "only make sense when we're dealing
> > with transaction or time." Why?
> >
> Because named restore point is a noop xlog record; besides, transaction and
> time involves xlog records that contain data.
Thank you. How obvious!
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-02-08 17:15:23 | Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-02-08 17:10:33 | Re: Range Types |