Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net
Subject: Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
Date: 2011-01-26 16:07:01
Message-ID: 4D4046A5.3020206@cs.helsinki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/24/2011 7:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Given where we've ended up on what we want printed, I'm forced to
> conclude that there is basically nothing usable in the submitted patch.

I personally feel that if we could even add this for explicit Filter
conditions, people would be a lot happier. While I agree that having
all the fancy stuff discussed in this thread would be nice, I don't
think they're worth postponing the Filter part to 9.2.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-26 16:15:40 Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-26 16:05:32 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove arbitrary ALTER TABLE .. ADD COLUMN restriction.