Re: SSI and Hot Standby

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: SSI and Hot Standby
Date: 2011-01-20 07:36:47
Message-ID: 4D37E60F.60803@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20.01.2011 03:05, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> If we don't do something like this, do we just provide REPEATABLE
> READ on the standby as the strictest level of transaction isolation?
> If so, do we generate an error on a request for SERIALIZABLE, warn
> and provide degraded behavior, or just quietly give them REPEATABLE
> READ behavior?

+1 for generating an error.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-01-20 07:55:20 Re: REVIEW: patch: remove redundant code from pl_exec.c
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2011-01-20 06:37:12 Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered