Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

From: Michael C Rosenstein <mcr(at)mdibl(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date: 2010-12-07 14:28:27
Message-ID: 4CFE448B.7020600@mdibl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ack, I misspoke in my example last night about our use-case for
synonyms: we would ust them for trans-*schema* object referencing, not
trans-*database*.

Sorry about that--I fear that may have caused more confusion than necessary.

/m

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michał Roszka 2010-12-07 14:45:37 Re: SELECT is immediate but the UPDATE takes forever
Previous Message Michael C Rosenstein 2010-12-07 14:14:19 Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?