Re: Array interface

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Array interface
Date: 2010-11-10 09:42:39
Message-ID: 4CDA690F.1030408@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/11/10 22:10, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
> What might also be interesting is doing each INSERT with an array-load
> of bind variables appended to the VALUES clause - as this will only do
> 1 insert call per "array" of values.

This is probably more like what you were expecting:

rows num values tuples(i.e array size) elapsed
1000000 1 106
1000000 10 14
1000000 100 13
1000000 1000 14

I didn't try to use PREPARE + EXECUTE here, just did "do" with the
INSERT + array size number of VALUES tuples (execute could well be
faster). The obvious difference here is we only do rows/(array size)
number of insert calls.

Cheers

Mark

Attachment Content-Type Size
execinsert-values.pl application/x-perl 1.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-11-10 12:38:43 Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan
Previous Message 静安寺 2010-11-10 09:37:29 Why dose the planner select one bad scan plan.