Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-10-22 20:26:44
Message-ID: 4CC1F384.40709@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Yeah - what is the feasibility of cleaning up the things where there
> are naming inconsistencies right now?

Easy. Heck, the only reason we didn't do it 2 years ago was that we
were waiting for extensions before bothering.

Go Dimitri! Yaaay.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-10-22 20:27:14 Re: Integer input functions for date and timestamp
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-10-22 20:13:31 Re: Integer input functions for date and timestamp