> On 4 Jul 2025, at 10:50, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> From the discussion in [1], it seems this typedef was originally used as
> a function argument in early versions of the patch. However,
> the argument was removed in v23, and the typedef was accidentally left behind.
Yes, your analysis is correct. We could make common checking function and argument was not needed.
>
> The attached patch removes this unused typedef to clean up the dead code.
> Thoughts?
Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.