Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-10-19 15:59:35
Message-ID: 4CBDC067.2020408@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stefan, Dimitri,

> I disagree - limiting the maximum number of replication connections is
> important for my usecases.

Can you explain more? I clearly don't understand your use case.

> If we want something fixed *now*, should we perhaps just bump the
> *default* value for max_wal_senders to 5 or something?

If we're not going to remove it, then the default should be -1, which
should mean "same as max_connections".

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-10-19 16:06:37 Re: max_wal_senders must die
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-10-19 15:58:11 Re: Simplifying replication