Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date: 2010-09-17 16:01:18
Message-ID: 4C9390CE.3020104@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 09/17/2010 11:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is there any possibility that "git clone" isn't very trustworthy?
> It's a bit scary that we don't see identical views of this repository.

I should have thought that very unlikely.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Krogh 2010-09-17 16:24:51 Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-09-17 16:00:29 Re: Configuring synchronous replication

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-17 16:28:28 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-17 15:55:41 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion