| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
| Date: | 2010-09-17 15:39:04 |
| Message-ID: | 11844.1284737944@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Magnus posted an updated conversion this morning.
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=summary
> Evidently, however, he didn't do the same things you did, because
> there are DEFINITELY more than 9 manufactured commits in this one.
Um ... I just did
git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql-migration.git
and I only see nine. It's got some *other* problems though; compared
to a conversion I just finished locally, it's missing a whole lot of
history for some of the old jdbc files.
Is there any possibility that "git clone" isn't very trustworthy?
It's a bit scary that we don't see identical views of this repository.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-09-17 15:49:44 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-09-17 15:30:33 | Re: Configuring synchronous replication |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-17 15:55:41 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-17 15:20:28 | Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion |