Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Date: 2010-08-30 15:30:59
Message-ID: 4C7BCEB3.3030900@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 08/30/2010 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Let me just point out that awhile back we got a *measurable* performance
> boost by eliminating a single indirect fetch from the buffer addressing
> code path.

I'll take a look a that, thanks.

> So I don't have any faith in untested assertions

Neither do I. Thus I'm probably going to try my approach.

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-08-30 16:08:54 Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-30 15:29:20 Re: Assertion failure on HEAD (or at least git copy of it)