Re: MERGE command for inheritance

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Date: 2010-08-11 14:52:24
Message-ID: 4C62B928.8070201@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/08/10 17:45, Simon Riggs wrote:
> It seems clear that your work in this area will interfere with the work
> on partitioning and insert routing.

Nothing concrete has come out of that work yet. And we should have MERGE
work with inherited tables, regardless of any future work that may
happen with partitioning.

> We've seen it time and time again
> that big projects that aim to deliver towards end of a release cycle
> interfere with dev of other projects and leave loose ends from
> unforeseen interactions. There's no need for that.

I don't understand what you're saying, we're not in the end of a release
cycle.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-11 14:55:32 Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-11 14:50:07 Re: string_to_array with an empty input string