Re: MERGE command for inheritance

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Date: 2010-08-11 18:09:17
Message-ID: 1281549988-sup-763@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of mié ago 11 10:52:24 -0400 2010:
> On 11/08/10 17:45, Simon Riggs wrote:

> > We've seen it time and time again
> > that big projects that aim to deliver towards end of a release cycle
> > interfere with dev of other projects and leave loose ends from
> > unforeseen interactions. There's no need for that.
>
> I don't understand what you're saying, we're not in the end of a release
> cycle.

This patch still needs a lot of work before it's anywhere close to
committable. I agree with Simon that it is preferrable to clean it up
to make it committable *without* the burden of extra features. If
Boxuan continues to add more features, it will be end-of-release before
it is possible to think about committing it.

It seems better to have merge-no-inheritance in 9.1 than nothing. If we
can get the inheritance case working for 9.1, that's even better, but I
don't think it needs to be a hard requirement.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-11 18:12:27 Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-11 18:05:31 Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment