Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Marcelo Mas" <mmas(at)atg(dot)com(dot)uy>,<pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg
Date: 2010-08-06 15:37:34
Message-ID: 4C5BE5EE02000025000342C7@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

"Marcelo Mas" <mmas(at)atg(dot)com(dot)uy> wrote:

> Valgrind reports memmory leak when getting decimal data.

I wonder how much overlap there is between this and the patch for
fixing ECPG memory leaks offered by Zoltán Böszörményi three days
ago. There was much discussion about the dynamic UPDATE/DELETE
WHERE CURRENT OF patch, but I don't remember any discussion of the
other patch included in the same post.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg00115.php

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-08-06 17:22:19 Re: BUG #5605: round(attr_name,int) works bad
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-06 15:25:15 Re: BUG #5606: DEFERRABLE and DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED are the same

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-08-06 16:08:59 Re: refactoring comment.c
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-08-06 15:36:17 Re: refactoring comment.c