Re: BUG #5606: DEFERRABLE and DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED are the same

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Frank Heikens <f(dot)heikens(at)anva(dot)nl>
Cc: "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5606: DEFERRABLE and DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED are the same
Date: 2010-08-06 15:25:15
Message-ID: 20204.1281108315@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Frank Heikens <f(dot)heikens(at)anva(dot)nl> writes:
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/What%27s_new_in_PostgreSQL_9.0#DEFERRABLE_UNIQUE_CONSTRAINTS

>> I don't have to ask PostgreSQL to defer, it works in the second test
>> as well in the third test without any changes. I guess the example in
>> the wiki isn't correct, right?

> No, not even a little bit :-(. I hadn't seen that text; it needs to be
> corrected. Will hack on it in a moment.

I edited that wiki section, see what you think.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-08-06 15:37:34 Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg
Previous Message Frank Heikens 2010-08-06 15:13:49 Re: BUG #5606: DEFERRABLE and DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED are the same