Re: 9.0 release notes done

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.0 release notes done
Date: 2010-03-22 21:18:04
Message-ID: 4BA7DE8C.4080808@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/22/10 7:46 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I do not require them to submit SGML; just some format where I can
> identify the lines that changed. I can do the same for the release
> notes. I have to check the diffs anyway so manually merging in the
> changes isn't a problem.

So there are 2 large problems I have with the SGML version, let's see if
we can deal with them separately:

(1) re-arranging and regrouping the items: the stuff in the release
notes should end up in 7-8 clear categories, with items arranged in
descending order by importance. SGML+CVS makes this a task which cannot
be done collaboratively.

(2) Seeing my edits. There's no edit-->view-->edit cycle with the SGML,
and it's really hard to check grammar and languge ... let alone compare
stuff to the alphas ... in raw SGML.

--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-03-22 21:23:43 Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-22 20:48:29 Re: An idle thought