Re: make everything target

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make everything target
Date: 2010-01-27 23:02:23
Message-ID: 4B60C5FF.4010609@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>
>> On ons, 2010-01-27 at 10:41 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html +
>>> contrib".
>>>
>
>
>> +10
>>
>
>
>>> And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run
>>> installcheck for src, pl and contrib.
>>>
>
>
>> +100
>>
>
> These proposals sound reasonable to me too, but is "everything" an
> appropriate target name, or is there some other/better convention?
>

I'm not invested in the name. Suggestions welcome.

> I assume we don't want to mess with the default behavior (I don't
> want to, anyway).
>
>

Me either, although it's a bit of a pity history has stuck us with the
default behaviour.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-27 23:11:01 Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-27 22:51:29 Re: make everything target