Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: make everything target

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make everything target
Date: 2010-01-27 23:02:23
Message-ID: 4B60C5FF.4010609@dunslane.net (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>   
>> On ons, 2010-01-27 at 10:41 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>     
>>> I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html + 
>>> contrib".
>>>       
>
>   
>> +10
>>     
>
>   
>>> And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run 
>>> installcheck for src, pl and contrib.
>>>       
>
>   
>> +100
>>     
>
> These proposals sound reasonable to me too, but is "everything" an
> appropriate target name, or is there some other/better convention?
>   

I'm not invested in the name. Suggestions welcome.

> I assume we don't want to mess with the default behavior (I don't
> want to, anyway).
> 		
>   

Me either, although it's a bit of a pity history has stuck us with the 
default behaviour.

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-27 23:11:01
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-01-27 22:51:29
Subject: Re: make everything target

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group