Re: make everything target

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make everything target
Date: 2010-01-27 22:38:37
Message-ID: 15550.1264631917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On ons, 2010-01-27 at 10:41 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html +
>> contrib".

> +10

>> And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run
>> installcheck for src, pl and contrib.

> +100

These proposals sound reasonable to me too, but is "everything" an
appropriate target name, or is there some other/better convention?

I assume we don't want to mess with the default behavior (I don't
want to, anyway).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-27 22:46:35 Re: C function accepting/returning cstring vs. text
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-01-27 22:35:39 Re: CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27