Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy
Date: 2010-01-26 23:03:55
Message-ID: 4B5F74DB.30706@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Right, but the question is: is there enough use-case left in it to
> justify spending community effort on polishing rough edges? It's not
> like we haven't got plenty else to do to get 9.0 out the door.
>

The point I was trying to make is that I'm on the hook to do this
particular job whether or not the community feels it's worthwhile. The
only real decision is whether there's enough interest in upgrading this
utility to review and possibly commit the result, and I'm trying to
minimize the public resources needed even for those parts.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-26 23:14:14 Re: ECPGset_var
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-01-26 22:55:01 Re: Patch: libpq new connect function (PQconnectParams)