| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy |
| Date: | 2010-01-28 01:13:03 |
| Message-ID: | 2b5e566d1001271713s7bc87a3bwf24d55f1b4f1ace4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Right, but the question is: is there enough use-case left in it to
>> justify spending community effort on polishing rough edges? It's not
>> like we haven't got plenty else to do to get 9.0 out the door.
>>
>
> The point I was trying to make is that I'm on the hook to do this particular
> job whether or not the community feels it's worthwhile. The only real
> decision is whether there's enough interest in upgrading this utility to
> review and possibly commit the result, and I'm trying to minimize the public
> resources needed even for those parts.
I'm interested as well, so happy to continue to work with you on it, Greg.
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
http://endpoint.com - work
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-01-28 01:13:49 | Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-01-28 01:09:14 | Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - missing file |