Re: Unqualified pg_catalog casts in pg_dump

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unqualified pg_catalog casts in pg_dump
Date: 2020-03-23 16:57:37
Message-ID: 4B5E249F-3DDD-4C61-9D54-93E8BDC80ED5@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 23 Mar 2020, at 17:54, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> When looking at something different, I happened to notice that pg_dump is a bit
>> inconsistent in how it qualifies casts to pg_catalog entities like regclass and
>> oid. Most casts are qualified, but not all. Even though it functionally is
>> the same, being consistent is a good thing IMO and I can't see a reason not to,
>> so the attached patch adds qualifications (the unqualified regclass cast in the
>> TAP test left on purpose).
>
> While this used to be important before we made pg_dump force a minimal
> search_path, I'm not sure that there's any point in being picky about
> it anymore. (psql's describe.c is a different story though.)

Correct, there is no functional importance with this. IMO the value is in
readability and grep-ability.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-23 17:00:59 Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-23 16:54:04 Re: Unqualified pg_catalog casts in pg_dump