Re: Unqualified pg_catalog casts in pg_dump

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unqualified pg_catalog casts in pg_dump
Date: 2020-03-24 05:30:54
Message-ID: 20200324053054.GF1836@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 05:57:37PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Correct, there is no functional importance with this. IMO the value is in
> readability and grep-ability.

This may cause extra conflicts when back-patching.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-03-24 06:00:32 Re: Why does [auto-]vacuum delay not report a wait event?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-03-24 05:29:57 Re: Internal key management system