From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2010-01-23 19:49:30 |
Message-ID: | 4B5B52CA.2000909@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> How about "PugSQL"? It's kind of butch, keeps the "pg" part, and we could have a dog logo.
>>
>>
>
> IIRC, Pug is a little leprechaun in Shakespeare's Midsummer night's dream.
> Another logo change opportunity. :-)
>
>
I think you've confused "Puck" and "Snug". See
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Midsummer_Night's_Dream#Characters>
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2010-01-23 21:08:35 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2010-01-23 19:16:38 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2010-01-23 19:53:28 | Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH] |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-01-23 19:42:59 | Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH] |