Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-01-23 19:49:30
Message-ID: 4B5B52CA.2000909@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> How about "PugSQL"? It's kind of butch, keeps the "pg" part, and we could have a dog logo.
>>
>>
>
> IIRC, Pug is a little leprechaun in Shakespeare's Midsummer night's dream.
> Another logo change opportunity. :-)
>
>

I think you've confused "Puck" and "Snug". See
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Midsummer_Night's_Dream#Characters>

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2010-01-23 21:08:35 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-23 19:16:38 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-01-23 19:53:28 Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH]
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-23 19:42:59 Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH]