From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Application name patch - v3 |
Date: | 2009-12-28 23:03:45 |
Message-ID: | 4B393951.9010609@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le 28/12/2009 22:59, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> writes:
>> Le 28/12/2009 17:06, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>> I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array
>>> or two parallel arrays. Do you want to try coding up a sample usage
>>> of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful?
>
>> I'm interested in working on this. But I don't find the thread that talk
>> about this.
>
> Try here
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4AAE8CCF.9070808@esilo.com
>
Thanks. I've read all the "new version of PQconnectdb" and "Determining
client_encoding from client locale" threads. I think I understand the
goal. Still need to re-read this one
(http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/6222.1253734019@sss.pgh.pa.us) and
completely understand it (will probably need to look at the code, at
least the PQconnectdb one). But I'm definitely working on this.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-28 23:06:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-12-28 22:59:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |