Re: Application name patch - v3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v3
Date: 2009-12-28 21:59:24
Message-ID: 29753.1262037564@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> writes:
> Le 28/12/2009 17:06, Tom Lane a crit :
>> I think we were stalled on the question of whether to use one array
>> or two parallel arrays. Do you want to try coding up a sample usage
>> of each possibility so we can see which one seems more useful?

> I'm interested in working on this. But I don't find the thread that talk
> about this.

Try here
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4AAE8CCF.9070808@esilo.com

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-12-28 22:14:27 Re: Admission Control Policy
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-12-28 21:59:21 Re: Admission Control Policy