Re: Problem with return type of function ???

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Denis BUCHER <dbucherml(at)hsolutions(dot)ch>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with return type of function ???
Date: 2009-10-22 14:21:41
Message-ID: 4AE06A75.3040803@archonet.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Denis BUCHER wrote:
> Richard Huxton a écrit :
>> The other thing you could try is printing out row before returning it:
>> RAISE NOTICE 'row = %', row;
>> RETURN NEXT ROW;
>> It might be you've not got what you were expecting.
>
> Thanks a lot, good idea...
>
> But it looks good :

Hmm...

>> SELECT * FROM rma.test ('19G256259');
>> NOTICE: row = (12066602,19G256259,170224,PN6405B,2009-09-22,"FORERUNNER 405 NOIR",2009-09-22,15090,14748)
>> ERREUR: wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT
>> CONTEXTE : PL/pgSQL function "test" line 12 at return next
>>
>> \d rma.serial_number
>> Table « rma.serial_number »
>> Colonne | Type | Modificateurs
>> -------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
>> sn_id | bigint | not null default nextval('rma.serial_number_sn_id_seq'::regclass)
>> sn | character varying(30) |
>> no_client | integer |
>> no_art_bw | character varying(11) |
>> sn_fc_date | date |
>> desc_fr | character varying(40) |
>> sn_cm_date | date |
>> no_facture | integer |
>> no_commande | integer |

I was wondering if maybe there was a bug to do with domains or complex
column types, but there's nothing out of the ordinary here.

OK - can you generate a test script with just CREATE TABLE, CREATE
FUNCTION, one INSERT and a function-call? I'll try and recreate it here.
Oh, and what version of PostgreSQL are we talking about?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-22 14:33:35 Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
Previous Message Denis BUCHER 2009-10-22 13:59:56 Re: Problem with return type of function ???