Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Denis BUCHER <dbucherml(at)hsolutions(dot)ch>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
Date: 2009-10-22 14:33:35
Message-ID: 29935.1256222015@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Denis BUCHER <dbucherml(at)hsolutions(dot)ch> writes:
> I have a strange problem, because it worked in a fonction for a table,
> and now I created the same (?) function for another table and it doesn't
> work...

> The function is accepted but at runtime I get :

> ERREUR: wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT
> CONTEXTE : PL/pgSQL function "find_sn_live" line 26 at return next

Does that table have any dropped columns? If you don't remember
whether you ever dropped any columns, a quick look into pg_attribute
will tell you:
select attname from pg_attribute where attrelid = 'rma.serial_number'::regclass;

plpgsql isn't tremendously good with rowtypes that contain dropped
columns. I believe this particular case is fixed in CVS HEAD, but the
patch was a bit invasive and won't get back-ported to existing releases.
The workaround is to drop and recreate the table without any dropped
columns.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis BUCHER 2009-10-22 14:34:05 Re: Problem with return type of function ???
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2009-10-22 14:21:41 Re: Problem with return type of function ???