Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Date: 2009-09-26 00:10:58
Message-ID: 4ABD5C12.2080209@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>
>> What I find amazing is that it passed the test where I put it doing make
>> installcheck in an infinite loop for a long time. I guess that means the
>> regression tests hardly touch the concurrency code at all, which now I
>> think about it makes sense but I still find that very worrying. :-(
>>
>
> Try installcheck-parallel, which should be a bit better. It's probably
> not yet good enough though because it always runs the same tests
> concurrently.
>
>

It is also quite easy to set up your own schedule.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-26 00:23:12 Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-09-26 00:05:25 Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings