Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1
Date: 2009-09-25 20:30:30
Message-ID: 20090925203030.GR3914@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:

> What I find amazing is that it passed the test where I put it doing make
> installcheck in an infinite loop for a long time. I guess that means the
> regression tests hardly touch the concurrency code at all, which now I
> think about it makes sense but I still find that very worrying. :-(

Try installcheck-parallel, which should be a bit better. It's probably
not yet good enough though because it always runs the same tests
concurrently.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-09-25 20:32:31 Re: syslog_line_prefix
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-09-25 20:29:49 Re: WIP - syslogger infrastructure changes