Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09
Date: 2009-09-15 10:49:02
Message-ID: 4AAF711E.5060904@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
>>> IMO, it would be best if the status could be sent via NOTIFY.
>> To where?
>
> To registered listeners?
>
> I guess I should have worded that as "it would be best if a change is
> replication status could be signaled via NOTIFY" -- does that satisfy,
> or am I missing your point entirely?

Ok, makes more sense now.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-09-15 10:52:31 Re: FDW-based dblink (WIP)
Previous Message Sam Mason 2009-09-15 10:44:03 Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak