Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09
Date: 2009-09-14 17:54:38
Message-ID: 4AAE3D0E020000250002AF11@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:

>> IMO, it would be best if the status could be sent via NOTIFY.
>
> To where?

To registered listeners?

I guess I should have worded that as "it would be best if a change is
replication status could be signaled via NOTIFY" -- does that satisfy,
or am I missing your point entirely?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-09-14 17:54:49 Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-09-14 17:53:45 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types