Re: "Hot standby"?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Hot standby"?
Date: 2009-08-11 20:07:05
Message-ID: 4A81CF69.5020409@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

All,

So really, the "streaming replication" patch should be called "hot
standby", and the "hot standby" patch should be called "read only slaves"?

And *why* can't we call it log-based replication?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-08-11 20:22:43 Re: "Hot standby"?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-08-11 20:00:47 Re: Any tutorial or FAQ on building an extension?