From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG support for struct in INTO list |
Date: | 2009-08-05 14:28:11 |
Message-ID: | 4A7996FB.1030906@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes írta:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:04:00PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>> My question is: why not unroll the struct in the preprocessor?
>>
>
> The problem is not that the struct is unrolled in the preprocessor. I just
> don't like the idea of having two places where structs are unrolled when one
> could be sufficient.
>
Yes, one place should be sufficient. Read my other mail about
the modified get_var() function. I start to get convinced that
adjust_informix() and ECPG_informix_{get|set}_var() should not
be Informix compat specific at all.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
Bible has answers for everything. Proof:
"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more
than these cometh of evil." (Matthew 5:37) - basics of digital technology.
"May your kingdom come" - superficial description of plate tectonics
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-08-05 14:30:02 | Re: the case for machine-readable error fields |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2009-08-05 14:22:53 | Re: ECPG support for struct in INTO list |