| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG support for struct in INTO list |
| Date: | 2009-08-05 14:04:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20090805140445.GA19663@feivel.credativ.lan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 03:04:00PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> My question is: why not unroll the struct in the preprocessor?
The problem is not that the struct is unrolled in the preprocessor. I just
don't like the idea of having two places where structs are unrolled when one
could be sufficient.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-05 14:05:56 | Re: status of ECPG patches? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-05 14:04:00 | Re: Adding error message "source" |