From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5? |
Date: | 2009-07-16 10:00:21 |
Message-ID: | 4A5EFA35.8030006@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Committed.
Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the
>> 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion
>> with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this
>> until the tree opens for 8.5.
>
> That's OK. I'll wait for 8.5.
>
>> It's not a very likely scenario that
>> anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on
>> it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense....
>
> My first concern was whether the latest pg_standby can work with old postgres
> (old libpq.so).
>
> Regards,
>
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2009-07-16 10:02:59 | Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs |
Previous Message | Rick Gigger | 2009-07-16 09:34:56 | Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07 |