| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5? |
| Date: | 2009-06-25 13:35:20 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0906250635j2b787e2fl288473f2c4674a66@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the
> 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion
> with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this
> until the tree opens for 8.5.
That's OK. I'll wait for 8.5.
> It's not a very likely scenario that
> anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on
> it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense....
My first concern was whether the latest pg_standby can work with old postgres
(old libpq.so).
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-25 13:51:36 | Re: Resolving pg_standby -l |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-06-25 13:32:42 | Re: Why does pg_standby require libpq.so.5? |